United States v. Lukhman Hassan

974 F.2d 1344 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lukhman HASSAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10565. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 24, 1992. * Decided Sept. 2, 1992. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. CR-91-00081-EJG; Edward J. Garcia, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFIELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lukhman Hassan appeals his sentence, imposed under the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines"), following his conviction by guilty plea for bankruptcy fraud (Count I) and making false statements to a financial institution (Count XVI) in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 and 1014 respectively. Hassan claims the district court erred by increasing his offense level pursuant to Guidelines § 2F1.1(b)(1) based on a finding that he had caused "loss" in the amount of…