United States v. Santos Luis Serrano

974 F.2d 1344 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Santos Luis SERRANO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10608. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 4, 1992. * Decided Sept. 15, 1992. Before TANG, BOOCHEVER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The factual background of this case is set forth in our prior opinion, United States v. Serrano, 938 F.2d 1058 (9th Cir.1991). We remanded the case for the district court to indicate whether it accepted the sentence term specified in the plea agreement, in which event the court was to resentence Serrano in accordance with that agreement, "including in the record evidence of whether or not Serrano cooperated with the FBI." Id. 1061 . If the court rejected the sentence term, it was to inform Serrano of its decision and afford him an opportunity to withdraw his plea. Id. 3 The district court resentenced Serrano specifying that it accepted the plea…