United States v. Anthony Duane Vaughn

974 F.2d 1344 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Duane VAUGHN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50657. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1992. * Decided Sept. 14, 1992. 1 Before SNEED and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and WANGER, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Anthony Vaughn appeals his jury conviction for being a felon in possession of firearms shipped in interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). Officers seized three firearms from a storage container in the carport of his apartment building while executing a search warrant for cocaine and narcotics paraphernalia. Vaughn contends that the district court erred in denying his motions to suppress evidence, because the search warrant was not supported by probable cause, the search warrant was overbroad, and the firearms were not validly seized under the plain view doctrine. We affirm. STANDARD OF…