United States v. Thomas Russell Yeomans

974 F.2d 1344 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Russell YEOMANS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30174. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1992. Decided Sept. 3, 1992. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, No. CV 90-60069-REJ; Robert E. Jones, District Judge, Presiding. 2 D.Or. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, Circuit Judge, and CROCKER, * District Judge. 5 MEMORANDUM ** 6 Thomas Yeomans appeals his conviction by a jury of conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 7 * The district court's denial of a motion to dismiss is reviewed for clear error as to the district court's factual findings [ United States v. Christopher, 700 F.2d 1253, 1258 (9th Cir.), cert.…