Brad William Winkler v. Bill J. Bunnell, Warden Attorney General of California

Good Law
974 F.2d 1344·1992 WL 212164·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 30689
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 199291-55601California1,509 words

Opinion

Opinion

974 F.2d 1344 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Brad William WINKLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bill J. BUNNELL, Warden; Attorney General of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 91-55601. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 3, 1992. Decided Sept. 1, 1992. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV-90-1911-WPG; William P. Gray, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before POOLE, BRUNETTI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Brad William Winkler (Winkler) appeals the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief from a California state conviction. Winkler was convicted of first degree murder during the commission or attempted commission of a robbery, attempted robbery, and infliction of great bodily injury. We affirm. FACTS 3 Winkler was convicted of the February 22, 1983, first degree murder of Daisy Kessemeier, a flight attendant with Lufthansa…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.