United States v. Paul Arthur Gysels, Jr.

974 F.2d 1344 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul Arthur GYSELS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30394. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 17, 1992. * Decided Sept. 2, 1992. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, No. CR-91-00014-JDS; Jack D. Shanstrom, District Judge, Presiding. D.Mont. AFFIRMED. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, BEEZER and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 On appeal, Gysels argues that double jeopardy barred his trial and conviction for criminal contempt because the court had already found him guilty of such contempt. We affirm. 3 * Gysels assisted Wells in two methamphetamine manufacturing sessions. He later testified before a grand jury about his participation, with Wells and others, in methamphetamine manufacturing. The jury subsequently indicted those persons. 4 At their trial, Gysels appeared pursuant to a subpoena but…