United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Good Law
975 F.2d 572
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 19, 1992572California4,301 words

Opinion

Opinion

975 F.2d 572 Richard L. SCHULTZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles R. HEMBREE; Kincaid, Wilson, Schaeffer & Hembree, P.S.C.; Frank L. Bryant, Defendants, and Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc.; Robert J. McGuiness, Defendants-counter-claimants-Appellants. Richard L. SCHULTZ; Blas R. Casares, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BATEMAN EICHLER, HILL RICHARDS, INC., Defendant, and Frank L. Bryant, Defendant-Appellant. Blas R. CASARES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SPENDTHRIFT FARM, INC., et al., Defendants, and Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc.; Robert J. McGuiness, Defendants-Appellants. Blas R. CASARES; Richard L. Schultz, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SPENDTHRIFT FARM, INC., et al., Defendants, and Frank L. Bryant, Defendant-Appellant. Blas R. CASARES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SPENDTHRIFT FARM, INC., et al., Defendants, and Charles R. Hembree; Kincaid, Wilson, Schaeffer & Hembree, P.S.C., Defendants-Appellants. Richard L. SCHULTZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BATEMAN EICHLER, HILL RICHARDS, INC., et al., Defendants, and Charles R. Hembree; Kincaid, Wilson, Schaeffer & Hembree, P.S.C., Defendants-Appellants. Richard L. SCHULTZ, Plaintiff-Counter-defendant/Appellee, v. BATEMAN EICHLER, HILL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.