Elder v. Holloway

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 12842·975 F.2d 1388·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22255·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7888
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 199291-35146California4,762 words

Opinion

Opinion

975 F.2d 1388 Charles K. ELDER; Beverly S. Elder, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. R.D. HOLLOWAY; Other Unknown Employees and/or Agents, individually and in their official capacity as police officers for the Ada County Sheriff's Office, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35146. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 8, 1991. Decided Dec. 19, 1991. As Amended Sept. 17, 1992. John Charles Lynn, Lynn, Scott & Hackney, Boise, Idaho, for plaintiffs-appellants. James J. Davis, Boise, Idaho, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. RYMER, Circuit Judge: 1 This is a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in which Charles Elder claims that his constitutional right not to be arrested inside his home without a valid Idaho warrant was violated when law enforcement officers, after setting up armed surveillance, called him to come outside the house and arrested him on the porch. In opposition to the officers' motion for summary judgment on qualified immunity, Elder proffered three out-of-state cases to show that the law was clearly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.