Robert E. Anderson, a Single Man Bonnie Delillie v. United States

976 F.2d 736 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert E. ANDERSON, a single man; Bonnie Delillie, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16932. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 15, 1992. * Decided Sept. 18, 1992. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert E. Anderson and Bonnie Delillie appeal the district court's dismissal of their Federal Torts Claims Act ("FTCA"), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 , 2671 et seq., action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court found that Anderson, an active duty Marine at the time the cause of action allegedly arose, was barred from bringing his medical malpractice claim against the United States under the FTCA by the Feres doctrine. See Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 (1950). The court also found that Delillie, Anderson's mother, could not maintain her action for the loss of the "society and…