Donald Hickman v. Walt Wells

976 F.2d 736 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Donald HICKMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Walt WELLS, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-55635. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 15, 1992. * Decided Sept. 22, 1992. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Donald E. Hickman, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging his parole determination. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and review the denial de novo. Norris v. Risley, 878 F.2d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1989). We affirm. 3 Hickman's only assignment of error is that the district court erred by holding that he was properly treated as a special parole term violator when he committed a crime while on parole in 1989. Hickman argues that his special parole term could not commence until he finished serving regular parole from another sentence. Hickman would not be presently…