Warren S. Forest v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Good Law
976 F.2d 736·1992 WL 231074
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 18, 199292-15881California967 words

Opinion

Opinion

976 F.2d 736 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Warren S. FOREST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15881. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 16, 1992. * Decided Sept. 18, 1992. Before CHOY, ALARCON and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Warren S. Forest, a former FDIC employee, seeks reinstatement by way of an injunction while his Title VII action is pending. He appeals the district court's denial of his motion for a temporary restraining order and order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue. 1 We affirm. 3 * Denial of a preliminary injunction will be reversed only where the district court abused its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or clearly erroneous findings of fact. Religious Technology Center v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306, 1309 (9th Cir.1989) (citing Colorado River Indian Tribes v. Town of Parker, 776 F.2d 846, 849 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.