Leeroy B. Bostic, Jr. v. David Brackney, (Sis) Sam King, Ltd Charles W. Griffith, Ltd M. Strahl, Board Chairman

976 F.2d 736 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leeroy B. BOSTIC, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David BRACKNEY, (SIS); Sam King, Ltd; Charles W. Griffith, Ltd; M. Strahl, Board Chairman, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16131. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 15, 1992. * Decided Sept. 17, 1992. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 LeeRoy B. Bostic Jr. appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in his civil rights Bivens action in favor of the defendants. See Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Bostic contends that he was denied due process in connection with a prison disciplinary hearing. Specifically, he asserts that the defendants, acting in a conspiracy, violated his due process rights when they (1) failed to provide him with sufficient notice of the charges against him prior to his disciplinary hearing; (2) prohibited a key witness from testifying on…