Raymond Ludwig Frost v. Frank T. Galati, Judge Robert Shutts, Prosecuting Attorney Nancy Hinchcliff, Attorney James R. Hart, Attorney

976 F.2d 736 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Raymond Ludwig FROST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank T. GALATI, Judge; Robert Shutts, Prosecuting Attorney; Nancy Hinchcliff, Attorney; James R. Hart, Attorney, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15028. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 17, 1992. * Decided Sept. 21, 1992. 1 Before SCHROEDER, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Appellant Frost appeals the stay of his civil rights action pending exhaustion of his habeas corpus remedies and the dismissal of several, but not all, defendants in the action. Frost's action charges that numerous defendants violated his civil rights by conspiring in his criminal proceedings to plant, tamper, and withhold evidence; tamper with witnesses; obstruct justice; and alter police reports and trial transcripts. 4 Although the stay of his action is not a final judgment, we consider the district court's order under the…