Josefina Mairena-Sauzo v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
976 F.2d 737·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 31918
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 199289-70275California700 words

Opinion

Opinion

976 F.2d 737 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Josefina MAIRENA-SAUZO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 89-70275. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 7, 1990. Submission Vacated Oct. 9, 1990. Resubmitted Sept. 15, 1992. Decided Sept. 17, 1992. Before REINHARDT, LEAVY and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Josefina Mairena-Sauzo, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") summarily dismissing her appeal from an order of the Immigration Judge ("IJ") finding her deportable and denying her application for relief from deportation. The BIA, finding that Mairena-Sauzo filed her appeal solely for the purpose of delay and that she failed to identify meaningfully the issues on appeal, dismissed Mairena-Sauzo's appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1 (d)(1-a)(i) & (iv). The BIA also terminated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.