Lebbos v. Arguelles

976 F.2d 737 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Betsey Warren LEBBOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John A ARGUELLES; Malcolm Lucas; Allen Broussard; Edward Panelli; David N. Eagleson; Stanley Mosk; Marcus Kaufman; California State Bar; State Bar Court; L.J. Dewald, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-15764. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 13, 1992. * Decided Sept. 23, 1992. 1 Before CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges, and MUECKE, District Court Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Appellant, Betsey Warren Lebbos, appeals the District Court's dismissal of her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 4 Plaintiff/Appellant Betsey Warren Lebbos is an attorney who was licensed to practice law in the State of California. Defendant/Appellees are the California State Bar, State Bar Court, Justices of the California Supreme Court and an appointed referee of the State Bar Court. On January 9,…