Jerome Joseph v. Joseph Asencio Leonard Myers

976 F.2d 737 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jerome JOSEPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph ASENCIO; Leonard Myers, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16837. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 15, 1992. * Decided Sept. 18, 1992. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerome Joseph, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order denying his post-judgment motion to amend the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action as barred by the statute of limitations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . 1 We vacate and remand. 3 On November 1, 1989, Joseph filed a section 1983 civil rights action alleging that he was denied due process by the procedures used by California to effect extradition. Specifically, he alleged that he was detained an unreasonable amount of time without a probable cause determination on his warrantless arrest in…