United States v. Carl Reginald Grey

976 F.2d 738 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl Reginald GREY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50390. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 15, 1992. * Decided Sept. 22, 1992. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Carl Reginald Grey appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for one count of assaulting a federal officer in violation 18 U.S.C. § 111 (a)(1). Grey contends that the district court erred by refusing to ask the jury venire any questions regarding the veracity of law enforcement officers. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review the district court's voir dire for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Powell, 932 F.2d 1337, 1340 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 256 (1991); United States v. Contreras-Castro, 825 F.2d 185, 187 (9th Cir.1987). 4 A district court has discretion to reject…