United States v. Gabriel Jaime Jaramillo-Ochoa, United States of America v. Albaro Cano, United States of America v. Gabriel Jaime Jaramillo-Ochoa

Good Law
976 F.2d 738·1992 WL 234622
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 199291-50619California1,083 words

Opinion

Opinion

976 F.2d 738 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gabriel Jaime JARAMILLO-OCHOA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albaro CANO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gabriel Jaime JARAMILLO-OCHOA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50619. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 26, 1991. * Decided Sept. 23, 1992. Order Sept. 21, 1992. 1 Before FARRIS, DAVID R. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Cir. Judges. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Gabriel Jaramillo-Ochoa appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines following his conviction by guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846. He contends that the district court erred by failing to consider a downward departure on the ground that his offense was an isolated act of aberrant behavior. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.