United States v. Ismat T. Khalaf, United States of America v. Rosalinda Henry

976 F.2d 738 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ismat T. KHALAF, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rosalinda HENRY, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-10409, 91-10442. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 17, 1992. Decided Sept. 23, 1992. 1 Before KOZINSKI and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Ismat T. Khalaf and Rosalinda Henry were co-defendants in a jury trial for an alleged "check kiting" scheme. The jury found Khalaf guilty of aiding and abetting the misapplication of bank funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 656 and 2. The jury convicted Henry for making false entries and unauthorized transactions in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1005 . Both defendants appeal. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 . We affirm. BACKGROUND 4 Appellant Henry was an Assistant Vice President…