John Luther Spears v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General

Good Law
976 F.2d 738·1992 WL 232510·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 34297
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 199291-56518California916 words

Opinion

Opinion

976 F.2d 738 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Luther SPEARS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster General, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-56518. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 15, 1992. * Decided Sept. 22, 1992. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John L. Spears appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal of his Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000 (e) action alleging discrimination in connection with his termination from his position as a mail handler. The court found that Spears's action was time-barred because he had failed to file his complaint with the district court within the statutory 30-day filing period established under 42 U.S.C. § 2000 (e)5(f)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 Spears was terminated from his position as a mailhandler by Anthony Frank, the United States Postmaster…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.