United States v. Fred Bryant Grube

976 F.2d 738 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fred Bryant GRUBE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10456. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 19, 1992. * Decided Sept. 16, 1992. 1 Before KOZINSKI and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and VON DER HEYDT, ** Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 * Defendant Fred Bryant Grube was found guilty of two counts of interstate transportation of money obtained by fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314 . Grube argues on appeal that the district court abused its discretion in giving the government's requested jury instruction; abused its discretion by allowing the government to cross-examine Grube regarding his default on loan payments and involvement in civil suits; and improperly imposed multiplicative sentencing on the two counts. We affirm Grube's conviction because the district court did not abuse its discretion in giving the government's…