United States v. Sohrab Sameni, AKA Sam Sameni

Good Law
976 F.2d 739·1992 WL 234614·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35388
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 199291-50845California1,100 words

Opinion

Opinion

976 F.2d 739 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sohrab SAMENI, aka Sam Sameni, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50845. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 10, 1992. * Decided Sept. 23, 1992. Before WIGGINS, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Sameni pled guilty to uttering and possessing counterfeit securities and unlawfully possessing an immigration stamp. 18 U.S.C. §§ 472 , 1546(a). The district court sentenced him to twelve months in custody followed by a three-year term of supervised release and a $10,000 fine. Sameni appeals, arguing that the district court erred in (1) enhancing his sentence for obstruction of justice; (2) denying a reduction for acceptance of responsibility; and (3) failing to find that he did not possess the immigration stamps for profit. We affirm in all respects. Discussion A. Two days before he was indicted, Sameni paid $1.1 million…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.