United States v. Maria Dolores Rodriguez-De Pelayo

976 F.2d 739 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Maria Dolores RODRIGUEZ-DE PELAYO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50582. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 21, 1992. Decided Sept. 24, 1992. 1 Before TANG and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges, and SHUBB, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Maria Dolores Rodriguez-De Pelayo ("Rodriguez") appeals her jury conviction for importing and possessing marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 952, 960. Rodriguez challenges the district court's restriction of Rodriguez' cross-examination of a government witness and denying her motion for a new trial based upon allegedly new evidence. We affirm. I. 4 Rodriguez argues that her conviction should be reversed because the district court restricted her cross-examination of a government witness and violated her constitutional right to confrontation…