United States v. Fermin Vital Canchola

Good Law
976 F.2d 739·1992 WL 234471·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35391
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 199290-10191California1,561 words

Opinion

Opinion

976 F.2d 739 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Fermin Vital CANCHOLA, Defendant/Appellant. No. 90-10191. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 15, 1992. * Decided Sept. 23, 1992. Before CHOY, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and ALARCON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Fermin Vital-Canchola ("Vital") appeals from his conviction on one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 & 841(a)(1) and one count of possession with the intent to distribute cocaine as well as aiding and abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(2) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Finding his claims lack merit, we affirm. 3 On December 28, 1988 Vital was indicted along with codefendants Guadalupe Lopez, Teodulo Hernandez Alvarado, and Abraham Medina Roman on one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 & 841(a)(1), and one count of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.