Betty Dove Wright v. Homestake Mining Company, a Delaware Corporation

976 F.2d 739 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Betty Dove WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOMESTAKE MINING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16901. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 15, 1992. * Decided Sept. 18, 1992. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Betty Dove Wright appeals pro se the district court's orders (1) denying her motion for default judgment, (2) denying her motion for Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 sanctions; and (2) dismissing her action with prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 * We review the district court's denial of a motion for default judgment for an abuse of discretion. Pau v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co., 928 F.2d 880, 885 (9th Cir.1991). 1 4 Wright's briefs are somewhat confusing but she appears to contend that the district court erred by denying her motion for default…