Kenneth L. Erickson v. United States of America Bryon Simon Douglas Hebert Kenneth Ingleby Charles Hill

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 13757·976 F.2d 1299·1992 WL 253068·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24980·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8374
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 7, 199291-55292California1,766 words

Opinion

Opinion

Erickson appeals the district court’s dismissal of his action for damages on several theories of constitutional tort, as well as under the Federal Tort Claims Act (the Act), against the United States government and several officials of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the United States Customs Service (Customs Service). Erickson alleges DEA and Customs Service officials sent him to Mexico with inadequate protection, where he was arrested, imprisoned, and tortured by Mexican authorities. He challenges the district court’s dismissal of his constitutional tort claims for failure to state a claim, and the court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants on his claim under the Act. We affirm the dismissal of the constitutional tort claim, but vacate and remand the dismissal of Erickson’s claim under the Act.

I.

While operating a financially troubled limousine service in San Diego, Erickson learned one of his customers wished to purchase an aircraft to smuggle drugs from Mexico into the United States. Erickson contacted the DEA, which arranged for him to meet with DEA agent Herbert and Customs Service agent Simon. At the meeting, Erickson discussed the drug smuggling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.