Avina v. City of Inglewood

977 F.2d 587 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Francisco AVINA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF INGLEWOOD, Defendant, and Edward ECCLES; Phillip F. Colonnelli; Brian Boyd; William Sidall; George D. Sanford; Alexander Perez; Mark Fronterotta; Lawrence Marino; Raymond L. Johnson; Defendants-Appellants. No. 91-56209. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 17, 1992. Decided Oct. 9, 1992. Before WIGGINS, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Francisco Avina sued the City of Inglewood, its chief of police, and eight police officers, under 42 U.S.C. 1983, for violations of his civil rights. Defendants' motions for summary judgment were denied, but the case has not yet gone to judgment. The police chief and officers claim that they were entitled to immunity; the City was not listed on the notice of appeal and is not a party before us. After examining the record, we conclude that the appellants' motion was on the…