William Henry Barber v. Roger Crist, Warden

977 F.2d 587 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William Henry BARBER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roger CRIST, Warden, et al., Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-16947. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 22, 1992. * Decided Oct. 2, 1992. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Barber, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from an order of the district court dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We affirm. 3 The decision to deny a petition for habeas corpus is reviewed de novo. Adams v. Peterson, 968 F.2d 835 , 843 9th Cir.1992) (en banc). In reviewing the district court's decision, state court factual conclusions are entitled to a presumption of correctness. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d); Collazo v. Estelle, 940 F.2d 411, 415 (9th…