Howard Browning v. City of Hawthorne Hawthorne Police Department Stephen Port, Police Chief Michael Effler, Hawthorne P.D. Charles Leonard, Hawthorne

977 F.2d 587 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Howard BROWNING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF HAWTHORNE; Hawthorne Police Department; Stephen Port, Police Chief; Michael Effler, Hawthorne P.D.; Charles Leonard, Hawthorne No. 91-55704. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 22, 1992. * Decided Sept. 28, 1992. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Browning appeals pro se from a summary judgment entered against him in a civil rights action brought by him under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Hawthorne (City) and three City police officers. Browning claimed that he was falsely arrested and falsely imprisoned. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp.,…