Terry Bishop v. Ron Angelone John Iganicio Carroll Ployher

Good Law
977 F.2d 587·1992 WL 295228·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 36221
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 19, 199292-15240California1,030 words

Opinion

Opinion

977 F.2d 587 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Terry BISHOP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron ANGELONE; John Iganicio; Carroll Ployher, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15240. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 13, 1992. * Decided Oct. 19, 1992. Before BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Terry Bishop, a Nevada State prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his civil rights action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 3217 (1990). Summary judgment is appropriate if the evidence, construed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, shows that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.