Victor Bagha v. Mitsui Manufacturers Bank, Victor Bagha v. Mitsui Manufacturers Bank, and Yutaro Hayashi Sam Simon Frank Frauto Donald Noseworthy

977 F.2d 587 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Victor BAGHA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MITSUI MANUFACTURERS BANK, Defendant-Appellee. Victor BAGHA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MITSUI MANUFACTURERS BANK, Defendant-Appellee, and Yutaro Hayashi; Sam Simon; Frank Frauto; Donald Noseworthy, Defendants. Nos. 91-55662, 90-56192. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1992. * Decided Oct. 15, 1992. 1 Before O'SCANNLAIN and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and ZILLY, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Bagha is a federal prisoner convicted of defrauding Mitsui Manufacturers Bank ("Mitsui"). In this action, Bagha brought suit against Mitsui and various officers and employees under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962 . Bagha initially appeals from denial of his request for default judgment which was filed as an attempted interlocutory appeal prior to eventual issuance of summary judgment. Bagha also appeals the…