Theodore A. Bohlmann v. Superior Court of Washington for Whitman County Washington State Department of Labor and Industries

977 F.2d 587 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Theodore A. BOHLMANN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR WHITMAN COUNTY; Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35927. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 13, 1992. * Decided Oct. 20, 1992. Before BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Theodore A. Bohlmann appeals pro se the district court's denial of his request for a preliminary injunction against enforcement of a state court judgment. In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Bohlmann claims that the enforcement of the state court judgment violates his constitutional rights. He contends that the district court erred by denying the preliminary injunction because the abstention doctrine and res judicata do not bar review of the state court judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm. 3 We review…