Anthel L. Brown v. Carroll v. South

977 F.2d 587 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Anthel L. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carroll V. SOUTH, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-36184. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 13, 1992. * Decided Oct. 21, 1992. Before BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anthel L. Brown, a Montana state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. 1 In his complaint, Brown alleged that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. Specifically, Brown alleged that prison officials failed to treat his broken hand for two weeks and ignored his repeated requests to be examined. We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3217 (1990), and affirm. 3 Brown's contention that the district court erred in granting summary…