Dansby v. United States

977 F.2d 588 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronnie DANSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, President, Secretary of the Defense, Secretary of the Navy, et al; The State of Georgia, Governor, et al.; The State of California, Governor, et al.; The State of Oregon, Governor, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-36292. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 13, 1992. * Decided Oct. 20, 1992. Before BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronnie Dansby, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the dismissal of his action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , alleging violation of his constitutional rights in connection with his service in the United States Marine Corps and criminal proceedings in Georgia, California, and Oregon. Dansby contends that the district court erred by dismissing the action…