Hawn v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

977 F.2d 589 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Karen L. HAWN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Raymond L. Hawn, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-35852. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 5, 1992. Decided Oct. 15, 1992. Before TANG, PREGERSON and ALARCON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. ("State Farm") appeals from the district court's decision granting Karen Hawn's motion for summary judgment on her claim for declaratory relief. The district court declared that State Farm is obligated to pay Hawn underinsured motorist benefits under all three State Farm policies held by Hawn despite the presence of an "other insurance" clause in each of the three policies. We affirm. 3 In 1990, Raymond Hawn was standing at a roadside when he was struck and killed by an…