Andrew D. Hanrahan v. Charles E. Cole, Attorney General for the State of Alaska

977 F.2d 589 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Andrew D. HANRAHAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles E. COLE, Attorney General for the State of Alaska, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-35115. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 15, 1992. * Decided Sept. 30, 1992. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Andrew D. Hanrahan appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. We review de novo, Norris v. Risley, 878 F.2d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1989), and we affirm. 3 In his federal habeas petition, Hanrahan challenged his Alaska state convictions on sixteen counts of commercial fishing of salmon without a valid permit in violation of Alaska Stat. § 16.43.140 (a). 1 Hanrahan contends on appeal that a regulation regarding fishing permits, Alaska Admin.Code § 05.210, is unconstitutionally vague on the ground that it fails to give adequate notice of the conduct that…