Fentriss M. Laws v. Fred J. Stock United States Parole Commission

977 F.2d 589 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Fentriss M. LAWS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Fred J. STOCK; United States Parole Commission, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-55311. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 13, 1992. * Decided Oct. 19, 1992. Before BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frentiss M. Laws, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging the revocation of his parole by the United States Parole Commission ("Commission"). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and affirm. 3 * Background 4 Laws was sentenced in 1958 for two bank robberies. On March 13, 1990, after a revocation hearing, the Commission revoked Laws's parole for the fourth time and set his parole date above the parole guidelines based on his multiple parole violations and on his criminal history of repeated convictions "for…