John D. Jenkins Joanne M. Jenkins Mark Jenkins v. Klamath County

977 F.2d 589 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John D. JENKINS; Joanne M. Jenkins; Mark Jenkins, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KLAMATH COUNTY; et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 91-35964, 91-35967. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 13, 1992. * Decided Oct. 21, 1992. Before BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John D. Jenkins and Joanne M. Jenkins appeal pro se the district court's order granting voluntary dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. Their son Mark Jenkins appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his section 1983 claims for failure to prosecute. John and Joanne Jenkins contend that the district court erred by ordering them to file an amended complaint after remand by this court following an earlier interlocutory appeal. See Jenkins v. Klamath County's Dep't of Public Safety, Nos. 88-3550 & 88-3707, unpublished memorandum disposition (9th Cir. Feb.…