Lisa A. Johnson, D.D.S. v. State of California

977 F.2d 589 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lisa A. JOHNSON, D.D.S., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16521. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 22, 1992. * Decided Oct. 1, 1992. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Johnson appeals in pro per the district court's grant of summary judgment against her in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the State of California and several of its judicial officers. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ; we have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo a district court's grant of summary judgment. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Martin, 872 F.2d 319 (9th Cir.1989). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Johnson, we find that there are no genuine issues of material fact and the district court correctly…