Koenig v. Snead

Good Law
977 F.2d 589·1992 WL 280975·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 36284
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 14, 199291-36310California1,180 words

Opinion

Opinion

977 F.2d 589 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard KOENIG, on his own behalf, and on behalf of his son, Jacob Koenig, as Jacob's father, natural protector and next of friend, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Jacob Koenig, Plaintiff, v. Linda Jean SNEAD, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-36310. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 9, 1992. * Decided Oct. 14, 1992. Before FEINBERG, ** GOODWIN and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Richard L. Koenig appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim on his section 1983, section 1985(3), and common law negligence claims against Linda Snead; his attorney, Ted Brindle; a group of Oregon State employees of Children's Services Division; and Dr. Jan Bays. The claims arise from Linda Snead's refusal to turn over Koenig's and Snead's son, Jacob Koenig, to Richard Koenig pursuant to a state custody order. We affirm. I. 3 The district court correctly dismissed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.