Robert Harrison v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company, a Licensed California Insurer

977 F.2d 589 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONNECTICUT MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a licensed California Insurer, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16649. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 5, 1992. Decided Oct. 8, 1992. Before FEINBERG * , GOODWIN and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiff Robert Harrison appeals the grant of summary judgment to defendant Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company ("Connecticut") in this diversity action seeking enforcement of a disability insurance policy. We affirm. I. 3 This case comes before us on stipulated facts. On October 14, 1988, Harrison applied for disability insurance from Connecticut. The application reflected no significant adverse medical history. After a standard investigation, a policy was issued. The policy contained the following incontestability provision: 4 Contesting your policy. We may not contest this policy…