Reyes v. City of Dinuba

977 F.2d 590 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Enrique REYES, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DINUBA; Ed Todd; Bud Toy; David W. Phillips; Milton A. Tromborg; Paul Magyar; Frank J. Gomez; Barbara Lankford; Raymond K. Millard; J.B. Westmoreland; Daniel McCloskey; John De La Montanya, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16041. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 8, 1992. * Decided Oct. 14, 1992. Before FERGUSON, O'SCANNLAIN and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Enrique Reyes, Jr. appeals from the summary judgment in favor of the city of Dinuba and several of its officials. Reyes's complaint alleges that city officials acted with racial animus in failing to grant occupancy and encroachment permits for homes he constructed in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 , 1983, 1985, and 1986. We agree with the district court that Reyes failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact that the officials were motivated by racially…