Colvin McCright Jr. v. Michael Santoki R.G. Borg
Opinion
Opinion
977 F.2d 590 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Colvin McCRIGHT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael SANTOKI; R.G. Borg, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15905. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 24, 1992. * Decided Oct. 1, 1992. Before CANBY, REINHARDT, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** Background 2 Colvin McCright, Jr. ("McCright"), appeals pro se the district court's order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. In the underlying action, McCright challenges under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 his transfer from San Quentin to New Folsom. McCright alleges that in retaliation for the filing of his § 1983 suit, prison officials denied him access to the prison law library, kept him in Administrative Segregation, placed him in a double cell with a dangerous cellmate who attacked him, denied him adequate medical treatment, and denied him access to his legal property. 3 To protect himself against future retaliation, McCright…