Charles Edward Puett v. Mike Blandford, Sgt. Tom Girard John Girard

977 F.2d 590 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles Edward PUETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mike BLANDFORD, Sgt.; Tom Girard; John Girard, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16940. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 13, 1992. * Decided Oct. 20, 1992. Before BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles Edward Puett appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) action. The district court dismissed the action pursuant to Rule 140-6 of the Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the District of Nevada because Puett failed to file a timely opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm in part, vacate in part and remand. 3 Puett filed this action against defendants Sergeant Mike Blandford, Newton Sikes,…