Ed Ransom v. Secretary of the Navy, Ed Ransom v. Secretary of the Navy, Ed Ransom v. Secretary of the Navy

Good Law
977 F.2d 590
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 19, 199291-15716California1,670 words

Opinion

Opinion

977 F.2d 590 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ed RANSOM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF the NAVY, Defendant-Appellee. Ed RANSOM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF the NAVY, Defendant-Appellee. Ed RANSOM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF the NAVY, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 91-15716, 91-15807, and 91-15808. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 12, 1992. * Decided Oct. 19, 1992. Before FLETCHER, POOLE and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ed Ransom appeals the district court's dismissal of his consolidated complaints of civil rights violations on the part of his employer. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. 3 We review the district court's order dismissing the complaints de novo. California Home Brands, Inc. v. Ferreira, 871 F.2d 830, 832 (9th Cir.1989). A motion to dismiss should not be granted unless "it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.