Rodney C. Phelps v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co., Inc.

977 F.2d 590 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rodney C. PHELPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED MISSILES & SPACE CO., INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16812. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 9, 1992. * Decided Oct. 14, 1992. Before FEINBERG ** , GOODWIN and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Plaintiff Rodney C. Phelps appeals pro se from the district court's dismissal with prejudice of his amended complaint against his former employer, Lockheed Missiles & Space Co. ("Lockheed"). We affirm. 3 On June 28, 1991, plaintiff served his original complaint by United States mail on Lockheed's parent corporation. The complaint was indecipherable except for numerous citations to inapplicable federal criminal statutes. 4 On August 28, the district court granted defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, for failure to state a claim, and for insufficiency of service of process. Plaintiff was given fifteen days…