Andre Schoka v. Peter Demosthenes

977 F.2d 591 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Andre SCHOKA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peter DEMOSTHENES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15984. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 22, 1992. * Decided Sept. 28, 1992. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Andre Schoka, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The district court dismissed Schoka's action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and we affirm. 1 Prison Transfer 3 Schoka contends that he was denied due process because state prison officials transferred him from the Northern Nevada Correctional Center to the Nevada State Prison. This contention lacks merit. 4 A prisoner does not…