Steven Stephens, A/K/A Mose Stephens v. Carolyn Schuck, James Blodgett, Washington State

977 F.2d 591 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Steven STEPHENS, a/k/a Mose Stephens, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carolyn SCHUCK, James Blodgett, Washington State, Defendants-Appellants. No. 90-35731. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 18, 1992. * Decided Oct. 7, 1992. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, BEEZER and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The Memorandum disposition filed on August 20, 1992 is withdrawn. 3 The issue presented is whether the district court erred when it determined that Carolyn Schuck, a Washington state prison dietician, violated Stephens' Eighth Amendment rights when she revoked his low sodium diet card. We conclude that Schuck's actions did not amount to deliberate indifference to Stephens' serious medical needs. 4 To establish a constitutional violation, an inmate must show that the prison authorities acted with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976).…