Lacey Mark Sivak v. Eugene R. Gilmore, Lacey Mark Sivak v. Eugene R. Gilmore

977 F.2d 591 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lacey Mark SIVAK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eugene R. GILMORE, et al., Respondents-Appellees. Lacey Mark SIVAK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eugene R. GILMORE, et al., Respondents-Appellees. Nos. 91-35230, 91-35602. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 22, 1992. * Decided Sept. 29, 1992. Before GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these companion cases, Lacey Sivak, an Idaho state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's orders granting the defendants' motions for summary judgment and a directed verdict in Sivak's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Sivak contends that he was deprived of property without due process of law by the defendants, Idaho state prison officials. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 The district court entered summary judgment for the defendants on Sivak's property deprivation claim on November 29, 1990,…