United States v. Francisco Delgado-Ramirez

977 F.2d 592 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco DELGADO-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-50501. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 6, 1992. * Decided Oct. 14, 1992. Before FARRIS, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Francisco Delgado-Ramirez appeals pro se the guilty plea he entered in the District Court for the Southern District of California for aiding and abetting the distribution of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1988). Ramirez claims his plea was coerced, that he was under the influence of medication, and that he understood that the sentence he would receive would run concurrently with a sentence he was already serving, not consecutively as the district court imposed. We affirm. 3 Ramirez was arrested on January 27, 1988 for selling 19 ounces of heroin to undercover agents. He was sentenced in the Central…